menu creating spurious log entries

joe · Post by **joe** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:06 pm

i love the menu system but i analyze my weblogs with analog and i get failed refers for each intry in my menu. they look like this in the apache access log (and thus in the statistics):

http://www.joe.to/text=hl
http://www.joe.to/text=about
http://www.joe.to/text=axn

am i doing something wrong for it to be creating these broken links in the log?

thanks
joe
http://www.joe.to

Post by **John** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:16 pm

You're running RC6, which is light-years behind the current RC17. Get the new version, read the included install file (things are different), and then let us know.

joe · Post by **joe** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:19 pm

ok thanks - i should have downloaded a file called menu_sample1.zip right?

joe · Post by **joe** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:41 pm

ok i replaced
milonic_src.js
mmenudom.js
mmenuns4.js
on the server. do i need to edit my menu_data.js file or do anything else other than replacing those three files? i read the install and readme docs and there was nothing in there about upgrading from a previous version.

thanks
joe

Post by **John** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:05 pm

joe wrote:ok thanks - i should have downloaded a file called menu_sample1.zip right?

Correct.

Post by **John** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:08 pm

joe wrote:ok i replaced
milonic_src.js
mmenudom.js
mmenuns4.js
on the server.

Good.

joe wrote:do i need to edit my menu_data.js file or do anything else other than replacing those three files?

Yes, there are some differences in the _data file. Look at the one included in the download to compare.

Also make sure you use the new call structure as explained in the install file.

joe · Post by **joe** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:31 pm

the only difference i saw was changing the end of the aI lines from ") to ;"); is there anything specifically i should be looking for? i'm not really good at doing a comparison just from looking at the 2 files

and i replaced the call structure, thanks for pointing that out

Post by **John** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:56 pm

No, it was just minor stuff like you mentioned. Looks like it's working OK.

joe · Post by **joe** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 5:11 pm

thanks a lot for your help

Post by **John** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 11:09 pm

You're welcome.

Can we assume it's all better now?

joe · Post by **joe** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 11:17 pm

i dont see it in the logs yet

seems to be ok